Matthew, J. P. Foyer, C. H. 2001. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot., 52 (360): 1383-4000.
Munir, M., Jamil, M., Baloch, J., Khattak, K.R. 2004. Impact of light intensity on flowering time and plant quality of Antirrhium magus L. cultivar chimes white, J. Zhejiang U. Sci., 5(4): 400-405.
Myers, L.F., Christian, K.L. R., Kirchner, R.J. 1982. Flowering response of 48 lines of oilseed rape to vernalization and day length. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 33: 927-936.
Nayak, S. K., Murty, K. S. 1980. Effect of varying light intensities on yield and growth parameters in rice. Indian J. Plant. Physiol, 23: 309-316.
Niu, J.Y., Gun, Y.T., Zhang, J.W., Yang, Q.F. 1998. Post anthesis dry matter accumulation and redistribution in spring wheat mulched with plastic film. Crop Sci., 38: 1562-1568.
Ozdemir, S. 1996. Path coefficient analysis for yield and its components in chickpea. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter, 3: 9-21.
Palta, J.A., Kobata, T., Turner, N.C., Fillery, I.R. 1994. Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen in wheat as influenced by post-anthesis water deficits. Crop Sci., 34: 118-124.
Papakosta, D.K., Gagianas, A.A. 1991. Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remohilization, and losses for Mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal, 83: 864-870.
Passioura, J.B., Condon, A.G., Richards, R.A. 1993. Water deficits, the development of leaf area and crop productivity. In: Smith JAC, Griffiths H (eds) Water deficits. Plant responses from cell to community. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford: 253–264.
Patro, B., Sohu, G. 1986. Effect of low light at different stages of the Crop on sink size. Oryza., 23: 123-125.
Picken, A.J.F., Stewart, K., Klapwicjk, K. 1986. Germination and Vegetative Development. In: J.G. Atherton and J. Rudich (Eds), the Tomato Crop. Chapman and Hall, London. p., 167-200.
Rawson, H.M., Evans, L.T. 1971. The contribution of stem reserves to grain development in a range of cultivars of different height. Australian J. Agric. Res., 22: 851-863.
Regnier, E.E., Harrison, K.S. 1993. Compensatory responses of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) to partial shading. Weed Sci., 41:541-547.
Richard, C.D. 1982. Physiological aspect of crop yield. 2nd end. Wisconsin, USA. 85-92.
Sabaghpour, S.H., Razavi, F., Danyali, S.F., Tobe, D., Ebadi, A. 2012. Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Analysis for Grain Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Iran. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Agronomy. 6 Pages.
Salisbury, F.B. Ross, C.W. 1992. Plant physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Co. Beltmon, California.
Sarmadnia, G.H., Koocheki, A. 1990. Crop Physiology. Jihad Daneshgahi Publication 25-30 pp. (In Persian).
Savin, R.M., Slafer, G.A. 1991. Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinean wheat cultivar. J. Agriculture Science Camb, 116: 1-7.
Sawada, O., Ito, J., Fujita, K. 1995. Characteristics of photosynthesis and translocation of BC lablelled Photosynth ate in husk leaves of sweet corn. Crop Sci., 35: 480-485.
Saxena, N.P. Sheldrake, A.R. 1980. Physiology of growth, development and yield of chickpeas in India. Proceeding of the International Workshop on chickpea Improvement, Hyderabad, India, and 28 February-2 March 1979. Patanchera, ICRISAT. pp. 106-120.
Schmidt, W.H., Colville, W.L. 1967. Yield and yield components of Zea mays L. as influenced by artificially induced shade. Crop Sci., 7: 137-139.
Shohael., A.M., Ali, M.B., Yu, K.W., Hahn, E.J., Islam, R., Paek, K.Y. 2006. Effect of light on oxidative stress, secondary metabolites and induction of antioxidant enzymes in Eleutherococcus senticosus somatic embryos in bioreactor. Proc. Biochem, 41: 1179-1185.
Sikuku, P.A., Netondo, G.W., Onyango, J.C., Musyimi, D.M. 2010. Chlorophyll fluorescence, protein and chlorophyll content of three Nerica rainfed rice varieties under varying irrigation regimes. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 19-25.
Singh. S., 2005. Effect of low-light stress at various growth phases on yield and yield components of two rice cultivar. Crop. Manag. Physiol, 37:76-92.
Smith, H. (Ed). 1981. Plants and the daylight spectrum. Academic New York.
Stallknecht, G.M., Perry, N., Karnes Neill, A., Bussan, J., Riesselman, J. 2001. Growing chick peas (Garabanzo Beans) in Montana. Site of Bozemam University.
Todd, A., Peterson, T.M., Blackmer, D.D., Francis, J., Schepers, S. 2005. Using a chlorophyll meter to improve N management. Soil Sci., 93-1171-A.
Turner, N.C., Wright, G.C., Siddique, K.H.M. 2001. Adaptation of grain legumes (Pulses) to water limited environments. Adv. Agron, 71: 193-231.
Uhart, S.A., Andrade, F.H. 1995. Nitrogen defoliation in maize. I: Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter patitioning, and kernel set. Crop Sci., 35: 1376-1383.
Urie, A.L., Leininger, L.N., Zimmer D.E. 1968. Effects of degree and time of defoliation on yield and related attributes of safflower. Crop Sci., 8: 747-750.
Van der Maesen, J.G.M. 1987. Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea. Pages 11-34. In Saxena, M.C., Singh, K.B. (Eds.). The Chickpea. C.A. B International, Wallingford, UK.
Van Herwaarden, A.F., Angus, J.F., Richards, R.A., Farquhar, G.D. 1998. Haying off the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer. II. Carbohydrate and protein dynamics. Australian Journal of agricultural Resarch, 49: 1083-1093.
Vavilov, N.I. 1949-50. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botanica, New York 13-1/6:26-38, 75-78.
Verghis, T.I., Mckenzie, B.A., Hill, G.D. 1999. Effect of light and soil moisture on yield, yield components and abortion of reproductive structures of chickpea (Cicer arientinum) in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Hort. Sci., 27:153-161.
Wada, Y., Wada, G. 1991. Varietal difference in leaf senescence during ripening period of advanced indica rice. Japanese Journal of Crop Sci., 60: 529-536.
Wadud, M.A., Rahman, G.M.M., Chowdury, M.J.U., Mahboob, M.G. 2002. Performance of red amaranth under shade condition for agroforestry system. J. Biol. Sci., 2: 765-766.
Wan, C., Ronald, E.S. 1998. Tillering responses to red:far-red light ratio during different phenological stages in Eragrostis curvula. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 40: 247-254.
Wiebold, W.J., Ashley, D.A., Boerma, H.R. 1981. Reproductive abscission levels and patterns for eleven determinate soybean cultivars. Agron. J., 73: 43-46.
Wilcox, J.R. 2001. Sixty years of improvement in publicly developed elite soybean lines. Crop Sci., 41: 1711-1716.
Willey, R.W., Holiday, R. 1971. Plant population, shading and thinning studies in wheat. J. Agric. Sci., Camb, 77: 453-461.
Winzeler, H., Nosberger, J. 1980. Dry matter production and content of nonstructural carbohydrates during the grain filling period as influenced by different pre-grain filling temperatures in two spring wheat cultivars. Z. Acker. Pflanzenbau, 149: 318-327.
Wong, G.G. 1991. Shade tolerance of tropical forages: A review. In Shelton, H.M. and Stuart, W.W. (eds). Forages for Plantation Crops. Australian Center f
or International Agricultural Research, Canberra, ACIAR Proceedings, 32: 64-69.
Xue, G., PMcintyre, C.L., Rattey, A.R., Van Her warden, A.F., Shorter, R. 2009. Use of dry matter content as e rapid and low-cost estimate for ranking genotypic differences in water-soluble carbohydrate concentration in the stem and leaf sheath of (triticum aestivum L.). Crop and Pasture Sci., 60: 51-59.
Yang, J., Jianha, Z., Zhiqing, W., Qingsen, Z., Wei, W. 2001. Remobilization of carbon reserves in response to water deficit during grain filling of rice. Field Crops Res, 71: 47-55.
Yoshida, S. 1972. Physiological aspects of grain yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiology, 23: 437-464.
Zamani, G., Koocheki, A. 1995. The effect of planting pattern and density on light interception, yield and yield components of maize cultivar. Agricultural Sciences and Technology Journal, 2(2): 17-30.
Zhang, M., Cao, T., Ni, L., Xie, P., Li, Zh. 2009. Carbon, nitrogen and antioxidant enzyme responses of Potamogeton crispus to both low light and high nutrient stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. In Press.
Zhao, D., Oosterhuis, D. 1998. Cotton responses to shade at different growth stages: Nonstructural carbohydrate composition. Crop Sci., 38: 1196-1203.
Zimdahl, R.L., 1993. Fundamentals of Weed Science. Academic Press, USA. 231p.
Abstract:
The effect of light intensity on the physiological and morphological characteristics of chickpea, like other crops, is of crucial importance.In order, the effects of shading on vegetative and reproductive growth of peas and also the intensity of the light yield, carried out an experiment via factorial in based on randomized complete block design with 3 replications in research farm on Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran during 2012-2013.Factors were including shading (no-shading, 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent) at different growth stages (vegetative and reproductive stages and all of growth duration). The results showed thatthe intensity of shading at different growth stages, significant effect on yield and yield components, chlorophyll content, dry matter pationing, remobilization photosynthesis. As shading had the most effect of on grain yield, hundred grin weight, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant,biological yield and harvest index at all of growth duration, reproductive and vegetative stages respectively. Biomass in 75, 50,25 and perfect shading at all of growth duration decreused 87.0, 73.3, 53.1 and 92,3 percent, compared to control, respectively. This value ware for grain yield 95.2, 80.8, 59.9 and 100 percent, ratio to control, respectively.
Key words: Shading, Light intensity, yield, growth, Chickpea.

Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Facultaty of Science and Agricultural Engineering
Department of Agronomy & Plant Breeding
M.Sc Thesis
Title of thesis:
The effect of light intensity on vegetative and reproductive growth stages of chickpea

By:
Lida Yari-Kamrani
Evaluated
and approved by thesis committee: as excellent

حق انحصاری © 2021 مطالب علمی گلچین شده. کلیه حقوق مح